The Modularization of HTMLDefinition in HTML Purifier WARNING: This document was drafted before the implementation of this system, and some implementation details may have evolved over time. HTML Purifier uses the modularization of XHTML to organize the internals of HTMLDefinition into a more manageable and extensible fashion. Rather than have one super-object, HTMLDefinition is split into HTMLModules, each of which are responsible for defining elements, their attributes, and other properties (for a more indepth coverage, see /library/HTMLPurifier/HTMLModule.php's docblock comments). These modules are managed by HTMLModuleManager. Modules that we don't support but could support are: * 5.6. Table Modules o 5.6.1. Basic Tables Module [?] * 5.8. Client-side Image Map Module [?] * 5.9. Server-side Image Map Module [?] * 5.12. Target Module [?] * 5.21. Name Identification Module [deprecated] These modules would be implemented as "unsafe": * 5.2. Core Modules o 5.2.1. Structure Module * 5.3. Applet Module * 5.5. Forms Modules o 5.5.1. Basic Forms Module o 5.5.2. Forms Module * 5.10. Object Module * 5.11. Frames Module * 5.13. Iframe Module * 5.14. Intrinsic Events Module * 5.15. Metainformation Module * 5.16. Scripting Module * 5.17. Style Sheet Module * 5.19. Link Module * 5.20. Base Module We will not be using W3C's XML Schemas or DTDs directly due to the lack of robust tools for handling them (the main problem is that all the current parsers are usually PHP 5 only and solely-validating, not correcting). This system may be generalized and ported over for CSS. == General Use-Case == The outwards API of HTMLDefinition has been largely preserved, not only for backwards-compatibility but also by design. Instead, HTMLDefinition can be retrieved "raw", in which it loads a structure that closely resembles the modules of XHTML 1.1. This structure is very dynamic, making it easy to make cascading changes to global content sets or remove elements in bulk. However, once HTML Purifier needs the actual definition, it retrieves a finalized version of HTMLDefinition. The finalized definition involves processing the modules into a form that it is optimized for multiple calls. This final version is immutable and, even if editable, would be extremely hard to change. So, some code taking advantage of the XHTML modularization may look like this: getHTMLDefinition(true); // reference to raw $def->addElement('marquee', 'Block', 'Flow', 'Common'); $purifier = new HTMLPurifier($config); $purifier->purify($html); // now the definition is finalized ?> == Inclusions == One of the nice features of HTMLDefinition is that piggy-backing off of global attribute and content sets is extremely easy to do. === Attributes === HTMLModule->elements[$element]->attr stores attribute information for the specific attributes of $element. This is quite close to the final API that HTML Purifier interfaces with, but there's an important extra feature: attr may also contain a array with a member index zero. elements[$element]->attr[0] = array('AttrSet'); ?> Rather than map the attribute key 0 to an array (which should be an AttrDef), it defines a number of attribute collections that should be merged into this elements attribute array. Furthermore, the value of an attribute key, attribute value pair need not be a fully fledged AttrDef object. They can also be a string, which signifies a AttrDef that is looked up from a centralized registry AttrTypes. This allows more concise attribute definitions that look more like W3C's declarations, as well as offering a centralized point for modifying the behavior of one attribute type. And, of course, the old method of manually instantiating an AttrDef still works. === Attribute Collections === Attribute collections are stored and processed in the AttrCollections object, which is responsible for performing the inclusions signified by the 0 index. These attribute collections, too, are mutable, by using HTMLModule->attr_collections. You may add new attributes to a collection or define an entirely new collection for your module's use. Inclusions can also be cumulative. Attribute collections allow us to get rid of so called "global attributes" (which actually aren't so global). === Content Models and ChildDef === An implementation of the above-mentioned attributes and attribute collections was applied to the ChildDef system. HTML Purifier uses a proprietary system called ChildDef for performance and flexibility reasons, but this does not line up very well with W3C's notion of regexps for defining the allowed children of an element. HTMLPurifier->elements[$element]->content_model and HTMLPurifier->elements[$element]->content_model_type store information about the final ChildDef that will be stored in HTMLPurifier->elements[$element]->child (we use a different variable because the two forms are sufficiently different). $content_model is an abstract, string representation of the internal state of ChildDef, while $content_model_type is a string identifier of which ChildDef subclass to instantiate. $content_model is processed by substituting all content set identifiers (capitalized element names) with their contents. It is then parsed and passed into the appropriate ChildDef class, as defined by the ContentSets->getChildDef() or the custom fallback HTMLModule->getChildDef() for custom child definitions not in the core. You'll need to use these facilities if you plan on referencing a content set like "Inline" or "Block", and using them is recommended even if you're not due to their conciseness. A few notes on $content_model: it's structure can be as complicated as you want, but the pipe symbol (|) is reserved for defining possible choices, due to the content sets implementation. For example, a content model that looks like: "Inline -> Block -> a" ...when the Inline content set is defined as "span | b" and the Block content set is defined as "div | blockquote", will expand into: "span | b -> div | blockquote -> a" The custom HTMLModule->getChildDef() function will need to be able to then feed this information to ChildDef in a usable manner. === Content Sets === Content sets can be altered using HTMLModule->content_sets, an associative array of content set names to content set contents. If the content set already exists, your values are appended on to it (great for, say, registering the font tag as an inline element), otherwise it is created. They are substituted into content_model. vim: et sw=4 sts=4